<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What I would like economics majors to know	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://curriculumconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/what-i-would-like-economics-majors-to-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://curriculumconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/what-i-would-like-economics-majors-to-know/</link>
	<description>3rd May – 14th June 2013</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 11:51:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Hemenway		</title>
		<link>https://curriculumconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/what-i-would-like-economics-majors-to-know/#comment-22</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Hemenway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 19:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curriculumconference2013.worldeconomicsassociation.org/?p=127#comment-22</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Using the income elasticity demand as the defining criteria, cigarettes would probably be considered a necessity rather than a luxury.  But I suspect for most products or services, whether luxuries or necessities, some of these 5 concepts would be important to remember.  For example, clothes.  Clearly what one wears is determined largely by what others are wearing (e.g., whatever the broad fashion is.  Few today wear what was fashionable in 1913).  Tastes are malleable (e.g., what width of tie looks good).  Most people know little about many aspects of their clothing (e.g. who actually made it, how flammable, cancerous is it), etc.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using the income elasticity demand as the defining criteria, cigarettes would probably be considered a necessity rather than a luxury.  But I suspect for most products or services, whether luxuries or necessities, some of these 5 concepts would be important to remember.  For example, clothes.  Clearly what one wears is determined largely by what others are wearing (e.g., whatever the broad fashion is.  Few today wear what was fashionable in 1913).  Tastes are malleable (e.g., what width of tie looks good).  Most people know little about many aspects of their clothing (e.g. who actually made it, how flammable, cancerous is it), etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Haiyun Zhao		</title>
		<link>https://curriculumconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/what-i-would-like-economics-majors-to-know/#comment-21</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haiyun Zhao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 20:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curriculumconference2013.worldeconomicsassociation.org/?p=127#comment-21</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Cigarette is a special luxury product, and a very good example. However, how about the implications of a necessary product to the arguments presented in your paper?

Haiyun Zhao]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cigarette is a special luxury product, and a very good example. However, how about the implications of a necessary product to the arguments presented in your paper?</p>
<p>Haiyun Zhao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
